Please read what I said in the article re the occupation of Iraq and 
Afghanistan and don't make up my argument. I clearly say it is an 
expression of inter-imperialist rivalry.
David Yaffe
At 23:36 29/12/2009 +0000, you wrote:
>The social relation was exported no question about that, but my point was 
>to critique the idea that the export of capital was a way of absorbing 
>excess surplus  value. It would be more realistic to see late 19th century 
>imperialism as relating to the export of labour. Recall the demographic 
>profile of Germany and the UK as population surplus areas. Canada, 
>Australia and South Africa were sites for exporting surplus 
>population.  William, left with the deserts of the Kalahari, the swamps of 
>the Ovango coveted areas more suitable for white settlement  -- hence the 
>ambitions for colonisation in South America, from which followed the need 
>to challenge the Monroe doctrine, and fromwhich followed the contingency 
>plans to invade the USA to enforce claims to Venezuela.
>
>It is worth reading the tin. IN 1900 the leading states were all quite 
>open about being empires with territorial claims. The situation today is 
>totally different.
>
>The suggestion that the US intervention in Afghanistan is for economic 
>motives of capital export is total joke. The only capitalist power 
>exporting capital on any scale to Afghanistan is China not the USA. Who is 
>developing the mineral reserves, copper mines there -- China, not the USA.
>USA only invaded Afghanistan after 9/11 as a cack handed attempt to strike 
>back at those who attacked it.
>
>Iraq is a rather different matter, here supplies of credit from the Saudis 
>was probably the motivating factor, but that does not fit in to the old 
>analysis of imperialism either.
>
>I feel DY is attempting to apply to the 21st century an analysis that was 
>at best a partial fit to the early 20th.
>________________________________________
>From: ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu [ope-bounces@lists.csuchico.edu] On 
>Behalf Of GERALD LEVY [gerald_a_levy@msn.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 8:45 PM
>To: Outline on Political Economy mailing list
>Subject: RE: [OPE] Britain--parasitic and decaying capitalism: A comment
>
> > How real then is the idea of capital export as underlying even late
> > 19th century imperialism.
>
>Hi Paul C:
>
>If you think of the export of capital as an export and expansion of a 
>social relation (most especially, the class relation between capitalists 
>and wage-workers) then it's quite real (but not without its contradictory 
>aspects).
>
>In solidarity, 
>Jerry 
>_______________________________________________
>ope mailing list
>ope@lists.csuchico.edu
>https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
>
>The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
>_______________________________________________
>ope mailing list
>ope@lists.csuchico.edu
>https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Dec 30 06:08:48 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 31 2009 - 00:00:02 EST