On 2010-08-08 11:20, D. Göçmen wrote:
> If you are interested you can also consult my paper on Rosa Luxemburg:
> http://dogangocmen.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/rosa-luxemburg-and-classical-german-philosophy.pdf
>
Thanks, seems succinct so I can print it.
> If you are realy interested in these questions you have to refer to
> the history of philosophy in its relation to social history. However,
> in particular Marx's "Afterword" to the third edition of "Capital",
> "Method of Political Economy" in the "Grundrisse" would be place to
> start with.
References like this is a practical way of being evasive: The first
specific question was whether there are other scientific methods for
other classes and if so what they are?
> With regard to your last question you can analyse the first paragraph
> of "Capital" (volume 1).
Certainly the first paragraph of vol. 1 is not an explicit answer to the
question:
The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of
production prevails, presents itself as "an immense accumulation of
commodities," its unit being a single commodity. Our investigation
must therefore begin with the analysis of a commodity.
Again, this is avoiding my specific question, which was to give the
criteria for 'dialectics'.
Let me make it simpler then: What do you view as the criteria of the
science method?
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sun Aug 8 06:12:37 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Aug 31 2010 - 00:00:02 EDT