On 29 September 2010 15:09, Jurriaan Bendien <adsl675281@telfort.nl> wrote:
>
> But I see that as a problem for your theory, since an F-22 Raptor is a
> commodity just like any other, built out of all kinds of other commodities.
> Why should the same products sold and used to make a civilian plane count
> as
> unproductive if they are used to make a military plane?
>
>
Upon re-reading this I noted another misunderstanding: those the production
of components, e.g. radar system, that enter into both a Boeing 767 and an
F-22 are *productive*, because the civilian air plane is a component of air
travel which enters the real wage vector.
If w is the real wage vector and A is the production matrix, then the
production of the non-zero elements of the vector:
c = (I - A)^-1 w
are the productive activities of the economy. Hence the quote above is a
misunderstanding.
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Sep 30 10:20:43 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Oct 02 2010 - 00:00:03 EDT