Comments on Laibman's OCC and Paul and
Allin's thoughts on it.
1. I do not know why Paul mentions the "level of
accumulation in OPE-L 3615. Paul, could you
explain.
2. Allin, I note that you seem to have problems with
Laibman's "physical capital/labor ratio." You're
clearly not alone. However, why would you not have
similar problems with "physical output/labor ratio"
or productivity?
John