>
> In addition to the relevance of this issue to the position that Andrew
>and many others yet to respond to the argument hold, this discussion also
>seems to come back to the earlier exchange with Fred over surplus value in
>Vol. I vs surplus value in Vol. II (after realization). Is your position
>that the two sums are identical (which I believe you were arguing and
>promised to return to) based upon an acceptance of the conservation
>principle, Fred?
>
> in solidarity,
> mike
>
Sorry, Mike, I have very busy with other things recently and I have to give
three lectures in the next week in Spanish, so I don't have the time to
think about these issues right now. I hope to return to the discussion
soon, but my last three months in Mexico are shaping up to be very busy.
Comradely,
Fred