>> "value" to mean the labour-time
>> socially necessary for the production of any given >> commodity."
>>
>>
Ian:
>>That is what I think it is too, but there are lots of >>questions about
what that means exactly.
Jerry:
>Yes, there are lots of questions: what are they?
I have a couple:
1. Doesn't Allin's definition actually refers *unilaterally* to the
SUBSTANCE OF VALUE?
2. Why does Marx distinguish and analyse the relationship between
value-substance (WERTSUBSTANZ) and value-form (WERTFORM)?
A.R.