search the site using Google

 

 

Identifications and Right to Counsel


Ron Miller was walking down the street one day when some policemen pulled him over on suspicion of a bank robbery that had occurred a couple hours earlier. Miller was brought down to the stationhouse where he remained for a short period of time. Miller was subsequently told he would be participating in a police line-up in front of some witnesses of the crime, where he objected and said he had an attorney representing him and required his presence.

The officers called the attorney, who arrived within a few minutes, but was refused permission to confer with Miller. They did, however, allow him to observe the line-up. After the line-up, Miller's attorney requested permission to speak to the witnesses in the line-up, but was refused.

At trial, Miller's attorney moved to suppress the evidence. What result?

Answer

(1) Generally, the right to have counsel at a pre-trial confrontation (lineups and showups) only applies after the initiation of formal procedures against the suspect.  Kirby v. Illinois.  The right is triggered when: defendant has been formally charged, given preliminary hearing, indicted, arraigned, or otherwise participates in a formal judiciary proceeding.  It is probably triggered by the issuance of an arrest warrant but not triggered if defendant is arrested without a warrant and then put in the lineup or show-up.  It is not triggered if the defendant is not arrested and consents to appear in the lineup.

See People v. Hawkins, 435 N.E.2d 376 (1982) and U.S. v. Bierey, 588 F.2d 620

                                       Next Problem
 
© 2007 Marc L. Miller & Ronald F. Wright