[OPE-L:2715] Hegelian syllogism

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:2716] Re: Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel"
• Previous message: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2714] Re: Marx's *Capital*: Europe and Russia"
• Next in thread: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2724] Re: Hegelian syllogism"
• Reply: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2724] Re: Hegelian syllogism"
• Reply: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:2784] Re: Hegel: particularity, universality, individuality"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

Chris,

thanks for your illuminating post #2723.

I have a couple of questions:

a) What would be the difference between the Hegelian and the Aristotelian
form of the syllogism?

b) Can we think of the Hegelian form of syllogism as a *historical*, *real
time* process, pressumably in contrast with the Aristotelian one, which
would be a *purely logical*, *atemporal* scheme?

I think Marx conceives the C-M-C and the M-C-M' as real time, historical
processes which cannot be collapsed into an "instantaneous", "logical" moment.

Thanks in advance!

Alejandro Ramos

• Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "[OPE-L:2716] Re: Re: Marx's relationship to Hegel"
• Previous message: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2714] Re: Marx's *Capital*: Europe and Russia"
• Next in thread: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2724] Re: Hegelian syllogism"
• Reply: C. J. Arthur: "[OPE-L:2724] Re: Hegelian syllogism"
• Reply: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:2784] Re: Hegel: particularity, universality, individuality"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:42 EDT