[OPE-L:2932] Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*

• Next message: JERRY LEVY: "[OPE-L:2933] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital"
• Previous message: Andrew_Kliman: "[OPE-L:2931] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• In reply to: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Next in thread: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2948] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Reply: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2948] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

A reply to Riccardo's P.S., in OPE-L 2926.

The answer is "no." Planck for instance isn't saying the old guard are
able to hoodwink the younger generation, but only that new truths cannot
*triumph* as long as an old guard that resists them dogmatically remains
in control.

Andrew Kliman

• Next message: JERRY LEVY: "[OPE-L:2933] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: starting point and capital"
• Previous message: Andrew_Kliman: "[OPE-L:2931] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• In reply to: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2926] Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Next in thread: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2948] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Reply: riccardo bellofiore: "[OPE-L:2948] Re: Re: Re: Need 1 and Luxemburg's *Accumulation of Capital*"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Apr 30 2000 - 19:59:45 EDT