[ show plain text ]
Ajit,
Doesn't your 3:20 p.m. note address your 3:32 pm. question to Fred?
And isn't the 3:20 p.m. note consistent with Michael Williams?
Paul
P.S. I just gotten Andrew and Rakesh's commentary on my paper and will
need some time for reply.
***********************************************************************
Paul Zarembka, supporting RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY
******************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
Ajit Sinha <ajitsinha@lbsnaa.ernet.in> said, on 05/13/00 at 03:32 PM:
>If the core of capitalism is "surplus value",
>then where do you find "surplus value" in chapter one?
Ajit Sinha <ajitsinha@lbsnaa.ernet.in> said, on 05/13/00 at 03:20 PM:
>... I think Marx's analysis in CAPITAL is best interpreted as
>synchronic rather than diachronic analysis. His repeated metaphor of
>"anatomy" suggest that he thinks that science constitutes in laying down
>the BODY on the operation table to analyze how the different parts of the
>body fit together rather than trying to understand a specie by looking at
>how it evolved from its predecessors. Cheers, ajit sinha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:09 EDT