[ show plain text ]
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Paul Zarembka wrote:
> Mattick Jr is not the first to argue the problem of
> measuring value. Althusser, "Crisis of Marxism", 1978,
> poses the following question:
>
> "When you read Section 1 of Book 1 of *Capital*, you find a
> theoretical presentation of surplus value: it is an
> arithmetical presentation, in which surplus value is
> *calculable*, defined by the difference (in value) between
> the value produced by labor power on the one hand, and the
> value of the commodities necessary for the reproduction of
> this same labor pwoer (wages) on the other. And in this
> arithmetical presentation of surplus value, labor power
> figures purely and simply as a commodity....
I don't see Althusser as making the general "no way you can
calculate values" claim. Rather, he seems to be saying it's
problematic to think of labour-power as having a determinate
value, at par with ordinary commodities; this elides the role of
class struggle in setting the rate of exploitation.
Allin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EDT