[ show plain text ]
At 21:43 18/06/00 -0400, you wrote:
>I don't believe that Niels Bohr had any such "delivery" in mind
>when he formulated his philosophical gloss on the scientific
>discoveries in which he played so large a part. He was
>struggling honestly with the implications of the new quantum
>findings, without any prior commitment to philosophical
>idealism. (I do agree, however, that later commentators --
>lacking Bohr's intimate knowledge of the actual physics -- have
>taken the "Copenhagen interpretation" as a springboard for
>instrumentalist and idealist musings.)
I would not accuse him of that, though I do believe that he
was influenced by the instrumentalist philosophies current
at the time.
The blessed delivery that I spoke of was how it has been seen
by numerous New Age, spiritualist and reactionary commentators
since.
Beyond that I regard the Copenhagen interpretation as itself being
an idealist interpretation of the subject matter.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 30 2000 - 00:00:04 EDT