Just for the record: I asked in my [4040] that my [4039] reply to Rakesh be disregarded since it was too hasty. On reflection, while I would change the wording if I had 4039 to write again, I stand by its substance. That is, I think Rakesh was changing the subject in his [4038], by envisaging a change in the labour-time accounts relative to the original table that we were trying to "transform". Allin Cottrell.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:10 EST