Paul, My analysis is based firmly on my reading of Marx, from which I reach my rejection of the labor theory of value. My papers on this were published in the Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7 years ago, and I have yet to have any Marxist formally critique my arguments. I'd be delighted if you'd like to be the first. Cheers, Steve At 12:23 23/10/00 -0400, you wrote: >> ... leads me >> to reject the premise that labor is the only source of surplus value, the >> whole transformation problem debate--from T-B on to TSS--is an irrelevance >> for me. >> >> Cheers, >> Steve > >Steve, may I ask why you bother with this list, which has Marx's theory of >the capitalist mode of production as its foundation? If you don't see >labor as the source of value, I think you are really talking to another >crowd (social class?). > >Paul Z. > > Dr. Steve Keen Senior Lecturer Economics & Finance University of Western Sydney Macarthur Building 11 Room 30, Goldsmith Avenue, Campbelltown PO Box 555 Campbelltown NSW 2560 Australia s.keen@uws.edu.au 61 2 4620-3016 Fax 61 2 4626-6683 Home 02 9558-8018 Mobile 0409 716 088 Home Page: http://bus.macarthur.uws.edu.au/steve-keen/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EST