A correction to my preceding post: I wrote: "However, it's quite possible that you think that they are THE formalization of Marx's values and, then, when you seek to devise a thought experiment aimed at rejecting "the relevance of labor value", you are looking to, say, "reform" *what you think* is Marx's theory. The purpose would be to take out such "cumbersome epicycles". If I'm not misinterpreting you, I'd say that those "Morishima-like labor values" are Marx's values." I meant: "...those "Morishima-like labor values" are NOT Marx's values." Alejandro Ramos
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Oct 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EST