Rakesh, Glad to hear that we are in agreement as I had supposed. I have yet to catch up with David's article, so thanks for the reminder: I'm putting it on my to do list. Julian >-----Original Message----- >From: Rakesh Narpat Bhandari [mailto:rakeshb@Stanford.EDU] >Sent: 02 February 2001 08:36 >To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu >Subject: [OPE-L:4824] Re: RE: Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates) > > >re 4822 >> >> >>As far as I can see, Rakesh's final sentence is in accord with my >>interpretation of Marx, but Rakesh seems to have taken my >original post to >>imply that I disagree with him about this. >> >>Are we talking at cross-purposes somehow? >> >>Julian > >Julian, >I think we are indeed in broad agreement. I am wondering what you >make of David Laibman's criticism of the sequential approach on pp. >318-19 Science and Society, 64, 3 (Fall 2000). I really don't >understand his charge of institutionalism. Is it clear to you? > >All the best, Rakesh >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:38 EST