ope-l-0102
By Date

Starting: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 03:34:59 EST
Ending: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 18:48:35 EST

• [OPE-L:4824] Re: RE: Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 03:36:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4825] value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? (was eigenvalues) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 03:40:12 EST)
• [OPE-L:4826] RE: Re: RE: Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates) P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 04:23:30 EST)
• [OPE-L:4827] Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? (was eigenvalues) Paul Cockshott (Fri Feb 02 2001 - 04:42:37 EST)
• [OPE-L:4828] Re: Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? (was eigenvalues) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 14:12:00 EST)
• [OPE-L:4829] Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Feb 03 2001 - 15:54:30 EST)
• [OPE-L:4830] Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Fred B. Moseley (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 09:31:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:4831] Re: Stationary prices (and profit rates) Fred B. Moseley (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 09:40:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4832] Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Fred B. Moseley (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 09:43:15 EST)
• [OPE-L:4833] is there a real tendency for the equalization of profit rates? Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 11:11:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4834] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 15:04:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:4835] RE: rent and the working class Drewk (Sun Feb 04 2001 - 22:30:13 EST)
• [OPE-L:4836] Re: is there a real tendency for the equalization of profit rates? Paul Cockshott (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 07:11:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4837] Re: is there a real tendency for the equalization of profit rates? Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 05 2001 - 08:44:22 EST)
• [OPE-L:4838] Re: Re: is there a real tendency for the equalization of profit rates? Paul Cockshott (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 06:46:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:4839] divided workers, united capitalists Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 09:20:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:4840] Data on working hours in NICs today Paul Cockshott (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 10:47:18 EST)
• [OPE-L:4841] Re: Data on working hours in NICs today Allin Cottrell (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 12:41:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:4842] Re: Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Feb 06 2001 - 14:24:46 EST)
• [OPE-L:4843] Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 07:16:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4844] Brecht Forum (NYC) Panel on Value Theory, Feb. 22 Drewk (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 12:10:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:4845] Is TSS a Copernicun revolution? Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 13:36:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:4846] Re: Is TSS a Copernicun revolution? ·ùµ¿¹ (Wed Feb 07 2001 - 20:42:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4847] Is TSS a Copernicun revolution? Alejandro Ramos (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 00:42:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4848] Re: Is TSS a Copernican revolution? Jerry Levy (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 08:15:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:4849] The TSSI vs. Physicalism Drewk (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 09:52:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4850] Re: The TSSI vs. Physicalism Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 11:22:17 EST)
• [OPE-L:4851] Is [temporal single-system] a Copernican revolution? (Huh?) Drewk (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 17:24:06 EST)
• [OPE-L:4852] the new value theory Jerry Levy (Thu Feb 08 2001 - 19:57:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4854] RE: the new value theory Drewk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 02:22:41 EST)
• [OPE-L:4853] Re: The TSSI vs. Physicalism Drewk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 02:21:54 EST)
• [OPE-L:4855] "Is TSSI Copernican?" P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 06:27:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:4856] Re: the new value theory Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 06:59:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:4857] Re: RE: the new value theory Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 07:16:00 EST)
• [OPE-L:4858] More on Copernicans P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 07:26:14 EST)
• [OPE-L:4859] Re: The TSSI vs. Physicalism Drewk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:40:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4860] Was Marx a Copernican or what? Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 08:41:25 EST)
• [OPE-L:4861] RE: Was Marx a Copernican or what? P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 10:58:13 EST)
• [OPE-L:4862] RE: Re: RE: the new value theory Drewk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 11:18:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:4863] RE: "Is TSSI Copernican?" Drewk (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 11:18:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:4864] TSSI perspectives on today's global economy Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 09 2001 - 19:50:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:4865] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 00:39:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4866] Re: Re: Re: value: primary, secondary; latent, possessed? Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 00:43:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:4867] Re: Re: Re: Re: modified significance of the cost price Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 00:56:34 EST)
• [OPE-L:4868] Re: Re: The TSSI vs. Physicalism John Ernst (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 12:25:42 EST)
• [OPE-L:4869] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 14:16:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:4870] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: modified significance of the cost price Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 10 2001 - 16:17:10 EST)
• [OPE-L:4871] Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Drewk (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 10:57:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4872] FAQ on LTV Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 11:18:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:4873] Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Steve Keen (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 16:57:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:4874] Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 17:16:29 EST)
• [OPE-L:4875] ceteris paribus Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 11 2001 - 18:12:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4876] Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) paul bullock (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 16:15:25 EST)
• [OPE-L:4877] Charles Andrews Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 20:49:47 EST)
• [OPE-L:4878] RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and theworking class) Drewk (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 21:58:11 EST)
• [OPE-L:4879] Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and theworking class) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 12 2001 - 22:16:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:4880] RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Drewk (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:55:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:4882] RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Drewk (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:55:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:4881] RE: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rentand theworking class) Drewk (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 00:55:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:4883] Re: RE: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rentand theworking class) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 01:38:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:4884] RE: Re: RE: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rentandtheworking class) Drewk (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 03:24:06 EST)
• [OPE-L:4885] Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 04:33:54 EST)
• [OPE-L:4886] Re: Was Marx a Copernican or what? Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 12:25:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:4887] Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Steve Keen (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 17:49:13 EST)
• [OPE-L:4888] Was Marx a classical? (was: Was Marx a Copernican or what?) P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 18:03:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:4889] Re: Was Marx a classical? (was: Was Marx a Copernican or what?) Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 19:13:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:4890] Re: Re: Was Marx a classical? (was: Was Marx a Copernican or what?) ·ùµ¿¹ (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 20:42:25 EST)
• [OPE-L:4891] Re: ceteris paribus Steve Keen (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 20:56:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:4892] Re: Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Feb 13 2001 - 23:26:33 EST)
• [OPE-L:4893] Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Fred B. Moseley (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 00:28:32 EST)
• [OPE-L:4894] RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and theworking class) Drewk (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 01:42:14 EST)
• [OPE-L:4895] Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) paul bullock (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 05:43:15 EST)
• [OPE-L:4896] Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Alan Freeman (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 06:34:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:4897] Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Steve Keen (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 07:14:35 EST)
• [OPE-L:4898] Re: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 07:58:28 EST)
• [OPE-L:4899] the value of labour power and the minimum wage Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 08:48:49 EST)
• [OPE-L:4900] RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' P.J.Wells@open.ac.uk (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 10:35:23 EST)
• [OPE-L:4901] Re: the value of labour power and the minimum wage Paul Zarembka (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 13:34:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4903] RE: Give us some NUMBERS, Fred! (was: rent and the working class) Drewk (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 14:08:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4902] RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Drewk (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 14:08:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:4904] faux frais, armaments, and security guard services Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 15:47:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4905] Re: the value of labour power and the minimum wage Steve Keen (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 16:13:33 EST)
• [OPE-L:4906] Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services paul bullock (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 17:54:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4907] Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Feb 14 2001 - 20:01:42 EST)
• [OPE-L:4908] causes of changes in prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 00:48:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:4909] armaments and value Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 07:52:41 EST)
• [OPE-L:4910] Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Drewk (Thu Feb 15 2001 - 23:20:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:4911] epicycles and smoke strategies Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 06:16:18 EST)
• [OPE-L:4912] Re: epicycles and smoke strategies Paul Zarembka (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 09:32:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4913] Re: Re: epicycles and smoke strategies glevy@pratt.edu (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 10:52:48 EST)
• [OPE-L:4914] RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Drewk (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 13:25:03 EST)
• [OPE-L:4916] Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 14:57:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4917] Re: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 15:00:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:4915] Re: epicycles and smoke strategies Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 14:37:08 EST)
• [OPE-L:4919] Re: armaments and value paul bullock (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 17:37:50 EST)
• [OPE-L:4920] RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Drewk (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 17:36:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4918] Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guardservices paul bullock (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 17:17:06 EST)
• [OPE-L:4921] RE: Re: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Drewk (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 18:01:23 EST)
• [OPE-L:4922] Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") rakeshb (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 18:15:18 EST)
• [OPE-L:4923] Re: Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guardservices rakeshb (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 18:52:20 EST)
• [OPE-L:4924] causes of changes in prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 19:04:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:4926] Re: Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Fred B. Moseley (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 23:44:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4925] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Fred B. Moseley (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 23:38:12 EST)
• [OPE-L:4927] Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Fred B. Moseley (Fri Feb 16 2001 - 23:49:14 EST)
• [OPE-L:4928] Re: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 00:32:46 EST)
• [OPE-L:4929] RE: causes of changes in prices of production Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 00:35:22 EST)
• [OPE-L:4930] RE: Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 00:35:30 EST)
• [OPE-L:4931] Re: RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 00:37:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:4932] Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:06:23 EST)
• [OPE-L:4933] Re: RE: Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices of production") Fred B. Moseley (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:09:14 EST)
• [OPE-L:4934] RE: rent and the workingclass Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:27:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:4935] RE: Re: Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in pricesof production") Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:27:31 EST)
• [OPE-L:4936] RE: Re: RE: Epicycles (was "causes of changes in prices ofproduction") Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:27:35 EST)
• [OPE-L:4937] RE: Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 01:55:28 EST)
• [OPE-L:4938] RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Drewk (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 03:05:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:4939] Re: RE: Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 04:30:05 EST)
• [OPE-L:4940] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: rent and the working class Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 06:58:12 EST)
• [OPE-L:4941] Re: RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 07:03:08 EST)
• [OPE-L:4942] Re: prices of production Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 07:35:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:4943] Re: Re: armaments and value Gerald_A_Levy (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 08:03:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:4944] IWGVT (Value Theory) website update: apologies for cross-posting Alan Freeman (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 13:31:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:4945] More Prices of Production John Ernst (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 14:04:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:4947] Re: Re: prices of production Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 14:42:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:4946] Re: More Prices of Production Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 14:42:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:4949] Re: Re: Re: armaments and value paul bullock (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 18:27:55 EST)
• [OPE-L:4948] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guardservices paul bullock (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 18:15:48 EST)
• [OPE-L:4950] Re: arms, roads and fictitious capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 17 2001 - 23:36:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:4951] Re: armaments and value Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 08:21:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:4953] Re: Re: armaments and value paul bullock (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 14:33:15 EST)
• [OPE-L:4952] Re: Re: arms, roads and fictitious capital paul bullock (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 14:12:30 EST)
• [OPE-L:4954] Re: RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Ian.Hunt (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 03:49:20 EST)
• [OPE-L:4955] Re: Re: Re: armaments and value Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 19:35:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:4956] Re: Re: Re: arms, roads and fictitious capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sun Feb 18 2001 - 22:35:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:4958] Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 01:11:06 EST)
• [OPE-L:4957] Andrew's interpretation of Marx's prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 01:06:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:4959] RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Drewk (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 03:45:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:4960] dynamic and chaotic systems Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 08:03:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:4961] Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services Paul Cockshott (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 08:58:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4962] Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 08:56:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:4963] Re: Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 10:18:32 EST)
• [OPE-L:4964] Re: Re: Re: RE: causes of changes in prices of production Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 10:21:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4965] Re: causes of changes in prices of production Drewk (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 13:03:34 EST)
• [OPE-L:4966] Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 14:31:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:4967] Re: Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 15:51:54 EST)
• [OPE-L:4968] Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 16:40:42 EST)
• [OPE-L:4970] Re: Re: Re: Re: armaments and value paul bullock (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 15:35:55 EST)
• [OPE-L:4969] Re: Re: Re: Re: arms, roads and fictitious capital paul bullock (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 15:34:47 EST)
• [OPE-L:4971] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: arms, roads and fictitious capital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 18:05:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4973] More on the Evil Twin Profit Rate Controversy Drewk (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 18:37:17 EST)
• [OPE-L:4972] RE: Expanded Reproduction Drewk (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 18:37:09 EST)
• [OPE-L:4974] Evil Twins, smoking guns, and The Score Card Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 19:05:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4975] RE: More on the Evil Twin Profit Rate Controversy Drewk (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 19:56:47 EST)
• [OPE-L:4976] Re: Evil Twins, smoking guns, and The Score Card Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 20:22:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:4977] Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 20:38:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:4978] Re: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 20:48:29 EST)
• [OPE-L:4979] Re: Re: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 21:01:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:4980] Re: RE: Copernicus: not just a 'scientific revolution' Ian.Hunt (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 05:59:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4981] Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Allin Cottrell (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 21:53:37 EST)
• [OPE-L:4982] Comments on 3 recent debates Allin Cottrell (Mon Feb 19 2001 - 23:39:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:4983] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 00:23:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:4984] RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 01:10:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4985] Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 02:00:08 EST)
• [OPE-L:4986] Re: Re: Re: Re: armaments and value Paul Cockshott (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 05:57:54 EST)
• [OPE-L:4987] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: armaments and value Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 06:38:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4988] Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Steve Keen (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:49:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:4989] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Steve Keen (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 07:38:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:4990] RE: Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 08:54:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:4991] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:05:34 EST)
• [OPE-L:4992] Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Fred B. Moseley (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 08:41:31 EST)
• [OPE-L:4993] Re: RE: Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Steve Keen (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:35:46 EST)
• [OPE-L:4994] RE: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 09:58:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:4995] Re: RE: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Steve Keen (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:00:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:4996] Re: Comments on 3 Recent Debates John Ernst (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:20:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:4997] RE: Re: Re: causes of changes in prices of production Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 10:46:41 EST)
• [OPE-L:4998] Luxury Production: Karl vs. Fred and Rakesh Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 12:21:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:4999] Re: Luxury Production: Karl vs. Fred and Rakesh Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:00:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:5000] RE: Re: Luxury Production: Karl vs. Fred and Rakesh Drewk (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:07:57 EST)
• [OPE-L:5001] Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Paul Zarembka (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 13:08:35 EST)
• [OPE-L:5002] Re: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:03:29 EST)
• [OPE-L:5003] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Alejandro Ramos (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 17:36:30 EST)
• [OPE-L:5004] Re: RE: Re: RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Gil Skillman (Tue Feb 20 2001 - 18:31:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:5005] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 00:05:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:5007] Re: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Allin Cottrell (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 09:10:28 EST)
• [OPE-L:5006] numerical example Fred B. Moseley (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 08:53:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:5008] Re: Re: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Alejandro Ramos (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 10:20:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:5009] Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services paul bullock (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 10:58:29 EST)
• [OPE-L:5010] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: arms, roads and fictitiouscapital paul bullock (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 11:36:09 EST)
• [OPE-L:5011] Re: Re: Re: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 12:01:20 EST)
• [OPE-L:5012] Re: Re: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 12:31:34 EST)
• [OPE-L:5013] Re: Re: Re: Re: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Paul Zarembka (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 13:17:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:5015] RE: numerical example!!! Drewk (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 15:34:09 EST)
• [OPE-L:5016] RE: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Drewk (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 15:51:08 EST)
• [OPE-L:5014] The RRPE Controversy Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 15:00:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:5018] Praise for Andrew's post Steve Keen (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 16:50:28 EST)
• [OPE-L:5017] Re: RE: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Gerald_A_Levy (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 16:38:28 EST)
• [OPE-L:5019] Re: double divrgence Allin Cottrell (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 17:00:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:5021] Re: Re: double divrgence Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 18:08:31 EST)
• [OPE-L:5020] Re: RE: numerical example!!! Fred B. Moseley (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 18:03:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:5022] Re: Re: Re: double divrgence Allin Cottrell (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 19:42:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:5023] Re: Re: Re: Re: double divrgence Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 20:36:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:5024] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: double divrgence Allin Cottrell (Wed Feb 21 2001 - 23:55:49 EST)
• [OPE-L:5025] Centres of Gravity Alan Freeman (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:33:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:5026] Centres of Gravity calculations Alan Freeman (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 00:40:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:5027] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: double divrgence Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 01:20:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:5028] Re: Centres of Gravity Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 02:26:18 EST)
• [OPE-L:5030] RE: Re: RE: Response to Andrew on "Proof" Drewk (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 03:33:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:5029] RE: numerical example!!! Drewk (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 03:33:20 EST)
• [OPE-L:5031] capitalization Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 06:31:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:5032] v = 0 Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 07:03:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:5033] Re: v = 0 Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 08:33:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:5034] Re: Re: RE: numerical example!!! Allin Cottrell (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 09:21:38 EST)
• [OPE-L:5035] Re: The RRPE Controversy Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 12:23:45 EST)
• [OPE-L:5036] RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy Drewk (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 14:58:24 EST)
• [OPE-L:5037] Re: RE: Re: The RRPE Controversy glevy@pratt.edu (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 15:28:12 EST)
• [OPE-L:5038] Discrimantion and Proving it John Ernst (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 16:24:19 EST)
• [OPE-L:5039] RE: The RRPE Controversy Drewk (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 16:58:59 EST)
• [OPE-L:5040] Re: Discrimantion and Proving it Gerald_A_Levy (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 19:08:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:5042] Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Fred B. Moseley (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:29:40 EST)
• [OPE-L:5043] Re: Centres of Gravity Fred B. Moseley (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:34:48 EST)
• [OPE-L:5041] Re: RE: numerical example!!! Fred B. Moseley (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 21:22:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:5044] RE: The RRPE Controversy Drewk (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 01:45:57 EST)
• [OPE-L:5045] RE: numerical example!!! Drewk (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 02:22:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:5046] Re: RE: The RRPE Controversy Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 03:51:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:5047] RE: The RRPE Controversy Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 04:14:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:5049] Re: Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services Paul Cockshott (Thu Feb 22 2001 - 11:09:10 EST)
• [OPE-L:5048] Re: RE: The RRPE Controversy Paul Cockshott (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 05:07:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:5050] one commodity models and illustrations Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 07:53:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:5051] Re: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Allin Cottrell (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:32:39 EST)
• [OPE-L:5052] RE: The RRPE Controversy Drewk (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:37:04 EST)
• [OPE-L:5053] RE: The RRPE Controversy Drewk (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 08:37:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:5054] Re: Re: Centres of Gravity Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 13:06:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:5055] Re: Re: Re: Comments on 3 recent debates Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 13:31:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:5056] A Threat From Andrew Kliman Gerald_A_Levy (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 19:29:11 EST)
• [OPE-L:5057] Re: RE: The RRPE Controversy Patrick L. Mason (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 22:06:23 EST)
• [OPE-L:5058] Concerning Andrew Kliman's allegations Gil Skillman (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 23:10:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:5059] Re: Re: Was Marx a Copernican or what? Duncan K. Foley (Fri Feb 23 2001 - 23:23:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:5060] RE: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" Drewk (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 03:23:53 EST)
• [OPE-L:5061] Re: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" [Lenin] Paul Zarembka (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 08:07:39 EST)
• [OPE-L:5062] On "Proof" [continuing this dialogue] Paul Zarembka (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 11:01:46 EST)
• [OPE-L:5063] arms, roads and fictitiouscapital Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Sat Feb 24 2001 - 15:18:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:5064] RE: Re: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" [Lenin] Drewk (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 00:04:13 EST)
• [OPE-L:5065] RE: On "Proof" [continuing this dialogue] Drewk (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 00:04:18 EST)
• [OPE-L:5066] Message from The Enemy Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 06:59:02 EST)
• [OPE-L:5067] RE: Message from The Enemy Drewk (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 07:19:58 EST)
• [OPE-L:5068] Re: Message from The Enemy Gerald_A_Levy (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 07:52:43 EST)
• [OPE-L:5069] RE: Re: Message from The Enemy Drewk (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 08:31:36 EST)
• [OPE-L:5070] Re: On "Proof" --> or "Interpretation" Paul Zarembka (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 09:28:07 EST)
• [OPE-L:5071] Re: RE: Re: Reply to Andrew on "Proof" [Lenin] Paul Zarembka (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 09:47:01 EST)
• [OPE-L:5072] RE: Re: On "Proof" --> or "Interpretation" Drewk (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 15:48:25 EST)
• [OPE-L:5073] Re: On "Proof" --> or "Interpretation" Paul Zarembka (Sun Feb 25 2001 - 21:56:51 EST)
• [OPE-L:5074] RE: Re: On "Proof" --> or "Interpretation" Drewk (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 01:09:47 EST)
• [OPE-L:5075] Re: one commodity models and illustrations Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 08:09:56 EST)
• [OPE-L:5076] CONFERENCE REBUFFS LEVY'S DENUNCIATION DEMAND Drewk (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:30:34 EST)
• [OPE-L:5077] Re: On "Proof" --> or "Interpretation" Paul Zarembka (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 09:39:44 EST)
• [OPE-L:5078] RE: [IWGVT] CONFERENCE ... Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:07:45 EST)
• [OPE-L:5079] empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 11:51:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:5080] Gary Mongiovi Gerald_A_Levy (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 15:44:39 EST)
• [OPE-L:5081] RE: Gary Mongiovi Mongiovi Gary (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 15:57:21 EST)
• [OPE-L:5082] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services paul bullock (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 17:02:57 EST)
• [OPE-L:5083] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: faux frais, armaments, and security guard services Rakesh Narpat Bhandari (Mon Feb 26 2001 - 22:43:48 EST)
• [OPE-L:5084] RE: empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Drewk (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 01:28:52 EST)
• [OPE-L:5085] Re: RE: empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 02:54:48 EST)
• [OPE-L:5086] Re: RE: empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Gerald_A_Levy (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:25:39 EST)
• [OPE-L:5087] RE: RE: empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Drewk (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:31:00 EST)
• [OPE-L:5088] Re: RE: RE: empirical evidence regaring the 'suppression' of the TSS perspective glevy@pratt.edu (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:47:26 EST)
• [OPE-L:5089] Ta-Ta Drewk (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 04:53:27 EST)
• [OPE-L:5090] RE: RE: empirical evidence regaring the "suppression" of the TSS perspective Michael Williams (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 05:03:16 EST)
• [OPE-L:5091] Re: Ta-Ta Gil Skillman (Tue Feb 27 2001 - 18:49:51 EST)

Last message date: Tue Feb 27 2001 - 18:48:35 EST
Archived on: Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:40 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:40 EST