In [OPE-L:4962] Paul Z wrote: > <snip, JL> But Fred hasn't answered Andrew's 4929 > below as far as I can see. > It's a tough question, maybe even unanswerable. In any > case, oughtn't > Fred to try to take a position on this question? Andrew > once asked me the > same question on another topic, and I told him I didn't > know the answer > and I still don't; I'm hoping to learn if there a way to > answer such a > question. Fred *DID* answer, in [OPE-L:4932], the question that Andrew asked. Indeed in Andrew's reply in [OPE-L:4937], he recognized this as an answer: "Well, finally, an answer. Not one I accept, but at least an answer". In solidarity, Jerry > "Drewk" <Andrew_Kliman@msn.com> said, on 02/17/01: > > >In reply to Fred's OPE-L 4924: > > >He wrote: "even if I am mistaken about market prices and the rate of > >profit in Chapter 6 of Volume 3, this does not affect the validity of my > >criticism of Andrew's > >interpretation of Marx's prices of production." > > >What, in your opinion, WOULD affect the validity of your > >criticism? Under what conditions would you be willing to concede that > >your criticism is indeed invalid? I really need to know. <snip, JL>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:39 EST