On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Gerald_A_Levy wrote: > You haven't given a reason yet *why* the unsold inventory should > be counted as part of constant capital. Please see Paul's ship-building example from the other day; it's the same issue. If the "unsold inventory" had been sold by the producer to a separate retailing enterprise, it would be circulating constant capital for the retailer, right? But re-drawing the juridical line between producer and retailer doesn't alter anything essential. Allin.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Wed May 02 2001 - 00:00:06 EDT