None of the postings that I am responding to, especially the one appended below by P. Bullock, has to do with whether an individual is or is not considered a terrorist by the US govt. The federal government's terrorist list is clearly constructed for political ends and since it omits state terrorists who are friendly to US and may include as terrorists anyone the state department currently finds objectionable, e.g., Yassir Arafit was on the terrorist list in the past, but is off today, and may be included again in the future if it suits the objectives of the federal government. Rather, the discussion has to do with what do people on this list consider terrorist behavior. I don't know what it means to say that I'm making the mistake of thinking rationally in irrational times. Precisely, when is it appropriate to equate British self-defense against a Nazi invasion or the African National Congress liberation struggle with the aimless massacre of 5,000 people associated with the destruction of the WTC? I have a student in my class. Her pregnant sister died in the WTC. I have a work-study student in my office who lost two uncles in the WTC. What, precisely, is a rational explanation for their loss? Or, even an acceptable irrational explanation? For me, there is unbridgeable moral chasm between mindless murder and legitimate self-defense/liberation struggles. peace, patrick l. mason At 10:16 AM 9/17/01 -0700, you wrote: >Ridiculous or not, he was on the State Department terrorist list. The >talk of terrorism means that anybody whose policies the government >dislikes can be a terrorist -- the category is not grounded in objective >behavior as Patrick suggests. Patrick, you are mking the mistake of >thinking rationally in irrational times. > >On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:13:44PM -0400, Patrick L. Mason wrote: > > > > > > This discussion is bizarre. Mandela, a terrorist!!! Pure garbage. > > > > To conflate terrorism with a legitimate freedom fighter is mind boggling. > > Everyone on the face of the earth who cared to know, knew the purpose of > > the ANC's struggle. On the other hand, no one knows (for certain, at the > > moment) who was behind last week's insanity or what possible goal the > > perpetrators were trying to achieve. > > > > People who target buildings with day-care centers are simply evil. The WTC > > included people of every religion, political ideology, economic class, > skin > > color, sexual preference, etc. among human beings. The only definable > > target was human life. > > > > Blowing up the world trade center (through the suicidal hijacking and > > destruction of planes that also contained a vast variety of people) is an > > extraordinarily vicious, utterly futile, and stupidly meaningless act. > > America has an $8.5 to $9.0 trillion GDP. This senseless act will have > zero > > longrun economic impact. Politically, it will only make it more difficult > > to create a more humane world. This horrific event eliminated all > > discussion of the World Conference Against Racism from the print and > > electronic. > > > > The public works injection associated with rebuilding New York and > > expanding the military will increase the size of the GDP. The American > > military-industrial complex will only be made stronger. Neither the > > Palestinians nor any Arab/Islamic political group fighting for a more > > democratic government or any form of economic justice will be helped by > > this act. > > > > To equate Mandela and the African National Congress with the > > nation/organization/individuals that carried out the actions of the past > > week is deeply insulting to anyone who thinks that morality, ethics, > > values, and the preciousness of life, especially human life, are something > > more than "contemptible bourgeois concepts." The ANC had as its policy > that > > only economic infrastructure and military targets were legitimate targets. > > > > Only degenerate, hedonistic, psychopaths murder thousands of people for > the > > sheer joy of killing. > > > > Maybe, I don't understand the mentality of some on "the left" anymore. > > Maybe, I never did. Many leftist wish to save whales, protect rain > forests, > > stop the senseless of baby seals, and (some) encourage humans to quit > > eating meat. Okay, that's all good. > > > > I'm all for saving whales, rain forests, and old growth forests and > spotted > > owls. But, I also think human life is worthy of salvation. I'm totally > > against the senseless murder of animals. I live in a wooded area with > > rattlesnakes, mocassins, copperheads, and coral snakes. I'm even against > > killing these deadly snakes. > > > > I have no idea who carried out this horrific action, but common decency > > would suggest that the perpetrators have nothing in common with the ANC or > > British teenagers training to fight off a Nazi invasion. > > > > patrick l mason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 04:48 PM 9/17/01 +0100, you wrote: > > >During the WW2 British boy scouts, from the age of 11 to 16 were > taught how > > >to sabotage an expected German invasion force, in ways which were almost > > >certainly 'suicidal'... ... no doubt we might have regarded this as > > >terrorism if we were with the Wehrmacht. > > > > > >Your question is strikingly naive, if you will excuse me saying so. > > >Mandela, Makarios, and many other post colonial leaders were well > > >established 'terrorist' leaders. > > > > > >What are the 'objective' or material causes of these acts? that is the > > >point. > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Chai-on Lee <conlee@chonnam.ac.kr> > > >To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu <ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu> > > >Date: 17 September 2001 11:21 > > >Subject: [OPE-L:5922] RE: Re: Re: Re: the wages of war > > > > > > > > > >Dear All, > > > > > > > >Could anybody distinguish between the terrorist and the guerrilla? > > > >I am purplexed. > > > > > > > >Chai-on > > > > > > > > > > > >-- >Michael Perelman >Economics Department >California State University >Chico, CA 95929 > >Tel. 530-898-5321 >E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Tue Oct 02 2001 - 00:00:04 EDT