[OPE-L:7746] Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method

From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 16:44:57 EDT

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "[OPE-L:7747] Re: Re: does the theory of surplus value primarily concern magnitude?"
Previous message: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7744] Re: Re: Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Next in thread: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7766] Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Reply: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7766] Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>From Fred's paper attached to [7745]:

"Volume 1 is about money from the very beginning (see the
papers by Arthur and Taylor is this volume)."

Nicky Taylor or some other Taylor?

In solidarity, Jerry.

Next message: Francisco Paulo Cipolla: "[OPE-L:7747] Re: Re: does the theory of surplus value primarily concern magnitude?"
Previous message: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7744] Re: Re: Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Next in thread: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7766] Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Reply: Fred B. Moseley: "[OPE-L:7766] Re: Re: M-C-M' and S Pt. 1: Method"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Oct 08 2002 - 00:00:01 EDT