From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@buffalo.edu)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 21:01:25 EST
Because her political life represented the anti-thesis of individualism. Paul --On Friday, January 10, 2003 6:46 PM -0500 gerald_a_levy <gerald_a_levy@msn.com> wrote: > A short query for Paul Z re [8296]: > >> Second, I'm much influenced by Althusser and Luxemburg and I >> don't see how the charge is sustainable against them, particularly not >> against Luxemburg (if she is individualistic, then it is all over for >> Marxism). > > If Luxemburg was individualistic why would that mean that "it is > all over for Marxism"? > > Solidarity, Jerry > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 11 2003 - 00:00:01 EST