[OPE-L:8307] Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics"

From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@msn.com)
Date: Fri Jan 10 2003 - 18:46:29 EST

Next message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8305] Re: Electronics and Value"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8306] measuring surplus value"
In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8296] Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8308] Re: Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Reply: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8308] Re: Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

A short query for Paul Z re [8296]:

> Second, I'm much influenced by Althusser and Luxemburg and I 
> don't see how the charge is sustainable against them, particularly not 
> against Luxemburg (if she is individualistic, then it is all over for 
> Marxism).  

If Luxemburg was individualistic why would that mean that "it is
all over for Marxism"?

Solidarity, Jerry

Next message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8305] Re: Electronics and Value"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "[OPE-L:8306] measuring surplus value"
In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8296] Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Next in thread: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8308] Re: Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Reply: Paul Zarembka: "[OPE-L:8308] Re: Re: Milios et al, "Karl Marx and the Classics""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 11 2003 - 00:00:01 EST