Re: Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear production theory?

From: valle (valle@SERVIDOR.UNAM.MX)
Date: Mon Dec 02 2002 - 14:24:40 EST


Ian, until I know they prefer "surplus approach".

Saludos
Alejandro Valle Baeza
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Wright" <ian_paul_wright@HOTMAIL.COM>
To: <OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:14 AM
Subject: [OPE-L] Which label: neo-Ricardian, surplus approach, or linear
production theory?


> I would like to use the correct or accepted label for the class of
economic
> models associated with Von Neumann, Sraffa, Pasinetti, Steedman and
> others. The common elements I want to characterise are: (i) simultaneous
> solution to a set of technical-production constraints, (ii) distribution
of
> a physical, surplus product, (iii) production of commodities by means of
> commodities.
> Can anyone tell me what is the accepted label for this class of models?
> I've come across labels such as "neo-Ricardian", "surplus approach",
> "linear production theory" and "physical quantities approach". Is there a
> commonly accepted label that the practitioners accept?
>
> Thanks for any help in advance.
>
> -Ian.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Dec 03 2003 - 00:00:00 EST