(OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?

From: gerald_a_levy (gerald_a_levy@MSN.COM)
Date: Thu Jan 29 2004 - 20:01:20 EST

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
In reply to: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: On the 'Unanswered Questions About Rent'"
Next in thread: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Reply: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello (again) Cyrus:

>  Therefore, oil workers with more differential productivity produce more surplus value. 

>  The rate of surplus value, as I indicated in my previous posting, pertains to the 
>  totality of labor and capital in a macroeconomic category.  

You are confusing me here.  You say that s/v is a macroeconomic rate, yet
you also assert that some workers on an industry level produce greater (or lesser) 
quantities of s.  Why are there two propositions consistent from your 
perspective?

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Previous message: gerald_a_levy: "(OPE-L) s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
In reply to: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: On the 'Unanswered Questions About Rent'"
Next in thread: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Reply: Cyrus Bina: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: s/v & c/v: macroeconomic categories only?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 31 2004 - 00:00:02 EST