Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?

From: Gary Mongiovi (MONGIOVG@STJOHNS.EDU)
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 16:04:58 EST 

Point taken.  
 
GM
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: OPE-L on behalf of Paul Zarembka 
	Sent: Tue 2/17/2004 3:58 PM 
	To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?
	
	

	Professional standards are that editors do not reveal who submitted what
	and its disposition, without permission of the author(s), correct?
	
	Cf. an editor saying for open reading that "I gather that Andrew Kliman
	has submitted a response to this piece, but North American submissions go
	to [my co-editor] Steve Pressman".  The message didn't go on to indicate
	that author had given the required permission.
	
	Paul
	
	***********************************************************************
	RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY,  Paul Zarembka, editor, Elsevier Science
	******************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
	
	On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Gary Mongiovi wrote:
	
	> I didn't think I'd breached a protocol. If anyone thinks I had, please accept my apologies.
	>
	> GM
	>
	>       -----Original Message-----
	>       From: OPE-L on behalf of Paul Zarembka
	>       Sent: Tue 2/17/2004 1:36 PM
	>       To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU
	>       Cc:
	>       Subject: Re: (OPE-L) Ernesto's "Damned Lies" ?
	>
	>
	>
	>       On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Gary Mongiovi wrote:
	>
	>       > Sorry for piping into this discussion so late.  Ernesto's piece "Value
	>       > & Exploitation: A Counterfactual Approach" was published in the April
	>       > 2003 issue (Vol. 15, no. 2) of The Review of Political Economy (which
	>       > I co-edit with Steve Pressman).  I gather that Andrew Kliman has
	>       > submitted a response to this piece, but North American submissions go
	>       > to Steve Pressman, and I don't know the status of the piece. I agree
	>       > with Gerry that it is not helpful to constructive discourse to label
	>       > the arguments of one's opponent lies. I have no idea whether Steve
	>       > Pressman, should Andrew's piece be accepted, will ask for a change of
	>       > title, or even if that is the title of the piece Steve has. He & I are
	>       > always quite scrupulous about not interefering in each others' editing
	>       > activities.
	>
	>       Gary, why are you broadcasting the above on an open list? Paul
	>
	>
	>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 18 2004 - 00:00:01 EST