Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_

From: Paul Cockshott (clyder@GN.APC.ORG)
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 17:04:38 EST

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "(OPE-L) MIKE DAVIS PLANET OF SLUMS"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Babbage and Marx"
In reply to: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Andrew Brown wrote:
>
> The theory has the same core as it always did, viz. LTV, emphasis on levels of
> abstraction, importance of VCC/OCC/TCC distinctions, emphasis on need to
> incorporate concrete, empirical, historical and contingent material.

Why do you consider VCC/OCC/TCC distinctions important.

It has always struck me that only there is only one well defined
concept there, the rest is handwaving.

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "(OPE-L) MIKE DAVIS PLANET OF SLUMS"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) Babbage and Marx"
In reply to: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Next in thread: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Reply: Andrew Brown: "Re: (OPE-L) Re: Systematic Dialectics and the Presentation of Historical Detail in Volume I of _Capital_"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 30 2004 - 00:00:02 EST