Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?

From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Fri Apr 23 2004 - 11:11:39 EDT

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
In reply to: Gerald A. Levy: "(OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Reply: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sorry, Jerry, but I didn't define accumulation of capital as you are
reporting I did.  My definition, drawn from the conclusion of my 2000
article is "accumulation of capital is increase of wage-labor with its
associated constant capital".  Paul

--On Friday, April 23, 2004 6:57 AM -0400 "Gerald A. Levy"
<Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM> wrote:

> _if_ the wages of  wage-workers whose salaries
> are paid out of v rises then the accumulation of capital may have
> increased (_if_ one defines accumulation of capital as Paul Z has
> done)

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
In reply to: Gerald A. Levy: "(OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Reply: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: (OPE-L) accumulation and de-accumulation of capital?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 24 2004 - 00:00:02 EDT