Re: (OPE-L) Re: Advisory Committee

From: Rakesh Bhandari (rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU)
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 21:44:17 EDT


>I once tried to break up a fight outside a pub. In return I was badly
>beaten and ended up in hospital. But although my nose required
>reconstructive surgery I felt I'd done the right thing.
>Actually, my new nose was better than the old one.
>
>Hold a vote of every member of OPE-L to decide whether the role of
>moderator should be subject to rotation.
>
>If a majority agree then the process can go further to arrange how
>rotation will take place. If the majority disagree then nothing
>happens.
>
>In my view, this would be the scientific way to proceed. Asking for
>diffuse opinions over a period of one week won't gather the necessary
>information.


I have expressed all my diffuse opinions on this matter. Plus, I have
no more time for this controversy now that the forty papers I have to
grade are in.  I accept Ian's plan, and needn't explicitly cast my
vote.

Yours, Rakesh


>
>-Ian.
>
>On Mon, 17 May 2004 13:57:30 -0700, Rakesh Bhandari
><rakeshb@stanford.edu> wrote:


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 18 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT