From: ajit sinha (sinha_a99@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Tue Jun 01 2004 - 08:56:18 EDT
--- Rakesh Bhandari <rakeshb@STANFORD.EDU> wrote: > At 3:12 AM -0700 6/1/04, ajit sinha wrote: > >Rakesh, I have no idea what is this about. Can we > >stick to the issues we are debating? Cheers, ajit > >sinha > > Out of his debate with Malthus Ricardo was led to > search for an > invariable measure of value, no? Sraffa claimed to > have devised just > that in the standard commodity, no? So why did > Malthus prompt Ricardo > to search for an invariable measure of value? > Why--or on what exact > assumptions--can (as you put it in the Westra and > Zuege volume) "the > effect on the money commodity of a change in wages > imply that even if > the net output has been kept constant in physical > terms a change in > its distribution between wages and profits could > very well change its > size when measured in... money terms"? > > Rakesh ______________ As I said, "money commodity". But this is not the issue we are discussing here. Let's keep to the issue. Cheers, ajit sinha __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 02 2004 - 00:00:01 EDT