Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Wed Apr 13 2005 - 21:42:28 EDT

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? labour"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 6:47 PM -0400 4/13/05, Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM wrote:
>How many questions were asked in the following?  I count
>one (1).
>

And you're still not speak to it. Are you saying that this signing
and ratifying were done freely? Who exactly signs and ratifies freely
so that the contracts
can be binding?

rb

Next message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? creativity"
Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Why aren't non-labourers sources of value? labour"
In reply to: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Next in thread: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Reply: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] Falling Fortunes of the Wage Earner"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 14 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT