Re: [OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Wed Jul 27 2005 - 13:08:53 EDT

• Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Conspiracy theories and Marxism"
• Previous message: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Maybe in reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Next in thread: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Michael L:

He could have used his notes on method from the "Introduction"
to the _Grundrisse_ as the basis for his "sheets" on method,
couldn't he?  That is, he already wrote something which was
never published (during his lifetime), but could have been
expanded upon at much greater length.   In any event (putting
that speculative question aside for the moment in order to ask
another one) why didn't he write more on method in the various
introductions, prefaces and postfaces of _Capital_?

In solidarity, Jerry
Boothbay Harbor

• Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Conspiracy theories and Marxism"
• Previous message: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Maybe in reply to: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "[OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Next in thread: michael a. lebowitz: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx: In Our Time"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 28 2005 - 00:00:01 EDT