Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Mon Sep 12 2005 - 10:24:39 EDT

• Next message: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Next in thread: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Reply: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Reply: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Reply: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> It looks on a par with Sokal's paper 'Transgressing the boundaries,
> towards a transformative Hermaneutics of Quantum Gravity', but without
> the sense of humour of the latter.

Hi Paul C:

Perhaps, but the authors seem to take this perspective seriously.
See <http://shepenkov.janmax.com/introduction.asp> and
<http://www.dialectical-physics.org/inf.ae.htm>

In solidarity, Jerry

• Next message: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Previous message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• In reply to: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Next in thread: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Reply: BHANDARI, RAKESH: "[OPE-L] Alice Thorner (1918 to 2005).The Alice I knew — and her Indian commitment"
• Reply: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Reply: clyder@GN.APC.ORG: "Re: [OPE-L] is algebra dialectical and vice versa?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 13 2005 - 00:00:02 EDT