Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']

From: Allin Cottrell (cottrell@WFU.EDU)
Date: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 11:19:18 EDT

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour"
Previous message: Michael Perelman: "Re: [OPE-L] New book by Michael P"
In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005, Christopher Arthur wrote:

> The Scots are sesitive on matters of terminology in ways I forget (Scotch
> whiskey but the Scottish people) ...

Err, that would be "Scotch whisky" (just to reinforce your point!)
-- "whiskey" is Irish.

Allin Cottrell

Next message: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour"
Previous message: Michael Perelman: "Re: [OPE-L] New book by Michael P"
In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Next in thread: glevy@PRATT.EDU: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 00:00:03 EDT