Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour

From: glevy@PRATT.EDU
Date: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 11:31:23 EDT

Next message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] New book by Michael P"
Previous message: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Next in thread: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> The Scots are sesitive on matters of terminology in ways I forget
> (Scotch whiskey but the Scottish people) but for sure they are 'Scots'
> not descendants of Walter Scott

Hi Chris:

Thanks for the correction to my mis-spelling.  I gather it is a
'sesitive' type of issue.

In solidarity, Jerry

Next message: Gerald_A_Levy@MSN.COM: "Re: [OPE-L] New book by Michael P"
Previous message: Allin Cottrell: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
In reply to: Christopher Arthur: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Next in thread: Paul Bullock: "Re: [OPE-L] Smith and Marx on the materialisation of labour [was 'basics v. non-basics']"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 02 2005 - 00:00:03 EDT