Re: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy

From: Rakesh Bhandari (bhandari@BERKELEY.EDU)
Date: Tue Nov 06 2007 - 13:10:23 EST

• Next message: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Next in thread: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Reply: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

For a good indication of how the analytical synthetic method which
Smith (arguably) developed from Newton would be incompatible with
Marx's method see

Adam Smith's Analytic-synthetic Method and the "System of Natural
Gideon Freudenthal.
Adam Smith's Analytic-synthetic Method and the "System of Natural
Liberty", in: History of European Ideas II,2 (1981), pp. 135 - 154

__________
An important comparative essay on Freudenthal and Witt-Hansesn could
probably be written. On the possible relation of Newtonianism to Marx
the three most important essays I know are these two, plus Burkett's.
And of course there is Boris Hessen, recently defended by
Freudenthal.

Please share citations on this most important topic.

Rakesh

• Next message: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Previous message: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• In reply to: Rakesh Bhandari: "Re: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Next in thread: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Reply: Martin Kragh: "[OPE-L] SV: [OPE-L] Marx and philosophy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 30 2007 - 00:00:03 EST