From: Ian Hunt (ian.hunt@FLINDERS.EDU.AU)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2008 - 18:58:11 EST
Dear Paul, I am confused: what you give sounds like a definition of accumulation that requires another term for cases where C increases but V does not. What is the term you propose for that, since it does not count as 'accumulation' by your definition? Cheers, Ian >Jerry, > >This is it and I don't know of anyone before me who defined accumulation of >capital like this: > > "Accumulation of capital is increase of wage-labor with associated >constant capital". > >I'm pretty far along in a book around this issue. > >Paul > >--On 1/7/2008 3:00 PM +0100 GERALD LEVY wrote: > >>Hi Paul Z: >> >>(The following question does not relate directly to what Jurriaan >>wrote or what is in the glossary:) >> >>From our previous discussions I recall that you used a different >>expression than accumulation of capital to refer to a situation >>where the quantity of money productively invested in capital >>grew but where the quantity of V remained constant. What >>was that expression again? I forgot. And where did that >>expression originate? >> >>In solidarity, Jerry > > > > >************************************************************************ >(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11-2001 "a benchmark in 9/11 research" > video summary from Snowshoe Films at http://snowshoefilms.com >(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA AND IN POLAND AND SYRIA >********************* http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka -- Associate Professor Ian Hunt, Dept of Philosophy, School of Humanities, Director, Centre for Applied Philosophy, Flinders University of SA, Humanities Building, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Ph: (08) 8201 2054 Fax: (08) 8201 2784
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST