From: Paul Cockshott (wpc@DCS.GLA.AC.UK)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2008 - 03:48:28 EST
I have always seen what Paul Z as focussing on as 'extended reproduction of capitalist social relations' not accumulation Paul Cockshott Dept of Computing Science University of Glasgow +44 141 330 3125 www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/ -----Original Message----- From: OPE-L on behalf of Dave Zachariah Sent: Thu 10/01/2008 8:33 AM To: OPE-L@SUS.CSUCHICO.EDU Subject: Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital Paul Z wrote: > In contrast, in my > three-page entry I argue that a focus upon "an increase in the amount of > physical means of production within an economy or its firms ... is the > usage in neoclassical or mainstream economics". But this is not any substantive criticism of what Paul C was saying. The growth of the means of production in terms of labour-value can hardly be said to be mainstream economics. (Even if it were, merely labeling it as such is not a valid objection to its usage.) //Dave Z
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST