Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital

From: Dave Zachariah (davez@KTH.SE)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2008 - 03:33:48 EST

• Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Reply: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Reply: Paul Zarembka: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Paul Z wrote:

> In contrast, in my
> three-page entry I argue that a focus upon "an increase in the amount of
> physical means of production within an economy or its firms ... is the
> usage in neoclassical or mainstream economics".

But this is not any substantive criticism of what Paul C was saying. The
growth of the means of production in terms of labour-value can hardly be
said to be mainstream economics.

(Even if it were, merely labeling it as such is not a valid objection to
its usage.)

//Dave Z

• Next message: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] accumulation of capital and the working class - actual non existence of variable capital"
• Previous message: Jerry Levy: "Re: [OPE-L] OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• In reply to: Paul Zarembka: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Next in thread: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Reply: Paul Cockshott: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Reply: Paul Zarembka: "Re: [OPE-L] glossary for V1 of _Capital"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 31 2008 - 00:00:06 EST