> Mr. Krugman won the prize for his research, beginning in 1979,
> that explained patterns of trade among countries, as well as what
> goods are produced where and why.
Yes, and his paper "The Theory of Interstellar Trade" was
dated July, 1978.
==========================================
> Ironically there are still many Marxists who hold to Ricardo's theory of "comparative advantage"
> which Marx almost certainly rejected, and Ricardian this theory is still mainfare in economics
> classes because it seems to explain the benefits of trade and the division of labour (specialization).
Hi Jurriaan:
_The New York Times_ story was misleading in that respect: Krugman accepted the
Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson (H-O-S) theory of trade rather than simply the Ricardian theory
of comparative advantage. While there are problems with the Ricardian theory - which,
as you say, Marx spoke to - there are additional problems with the neo-neoclassical
attempt to generalize comparative advantage theory within the context of general equilibrium
theory. Joan Robinson and Ian Steedman were particularly good at roasting
the H-O-S theory of trade.
In solidarity, Jerry
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Tue Oct 14 14:05:13 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:12:03 EST