We can use a surcharge penalizing electricity consumption over average in very category we devise for classifying consumers: industrial, residential, etc. This is a political decision that might complement quasi-market.
But the working of quasi-market is very different from the capitalist market. It seems that you keep judging the former one with the criteria only applicable to the last one.
A. Agafonow
________________________________
De: Dave Zachariah <davez@kth.se>
Para: Outline on Political Economy mailing list <ope@lists.csuchico.edu>
Enviado: lunes, 27 de octubre, 2008 19:40:24
Asunto: Re: [OPE] Electricity problems
on 2008-10-27 11:07 Alejandro Agafonow wrote:
> But arises another problem with services particularly sensitive to
> environmental constraints. Since consumers are going to pay lower
> prices they are going to be willing to waste electricity, leaving
> bulbs, computers, TV’s, etc. on!
>
>
>
In addition to Paul's comments, isn't this yet another reason why there
ought to be public ownership and planning of vital infrastructure? It is
mistake to think that market mechanisms can always solve resource
allocation problems better than centralised information coordination and
planning mechanisms.
//Dave Z
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Mon Oct 27 16:08:05 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 03 2008 - 15:12:03 EST