Alejandro:
Diego has already pointed out that _El Pais_ is *by no means* a
reliable source on any matter related to Chavez, the Bolivarian
movement, and Venezuelan politics. The fact that they supported
the 2002 coup is *proof* of this! So, in the end, we see *your*
lack of a **critical attitude** since you accept on faith any *negative*
stories about Chavez and related questions *regardless* of the source.
On the other hand, you simply dismiss any stories which report
positively on actions by the Chavez government as being
biased: it is *your own double standards* which have become
transparent.
How is it possible that a newspaper which supported the overthrow
of democratic institutions is able to remain in business with the same
people in ownership and control? I have *no doubt* that if there was
a failed coup in the USA, then all of the major supporters would be
imprisoned and any newspapers which had supported the coup would
be banned or taken-over by the government. The fact that _El Pais_
is free to openly publish and circulate its fabrications is *still more
PROOF* that *VENEZUELA IS THE MOST DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY IN
LATIN AMERICA*! If you do not see this, it should be clear to all that
it is because of your own double standards and lack of a critical
attitude.
In solidarity, Jerry
> So this leaves me with only one conclusion: **double standards**.
> The question is how your **critical attitude** is able to leave out this unaccountability,
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Thu Mar 5 08:00:15 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 31 2009 - 00:00:03 EDT