Go to:
http://bentham.org/open/tocpj/openaccess2.htm
I don't think nano-thermite evidence has been around so much as thermite.
Paul Z.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(Vol.23) THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF 9-11 Seven Stories Press soft, 2nd ed. 2008
(Vol.24) TRANSITIONS IN LATIN AMERICA ~~~Research in Political Economy~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka
On Sat 04/18/09 8:05 PM , "Paul Bullock" paulbullock@ebms-ltd.co.uk sent:
> Jerry,
>
> the nano-thermite evidence has been around some time ...already in
> programmes on the twin ( - tri ) towers on the internet... what is the
> reference to the journal and author(s) please.
>
>
> paul B.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <glevy@pratt.e
> du>To: <ope@li
> sts.csuchico.edu>Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 7:35 PM
> Subject: [OPE] The Science of 9/11
>
>
> >
> >
> > FYI.
> > In solidarity, Jerry
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------- Original
> Message> ----------------------------
> > Subject: Deseret News: Traces of
> > Explosives in 9/11 Dust (Smoking Gun Proving
> 9/11 Was an Inside Job)> From: "Richard Curtis" <richa
> rdcurtis42@MSN.COM>> Date: Sun, April 12, 2009 1:30 pm
> >
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------->
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Something interesting happened
> > last week but most of the world
> didn̢۪t notice. What> happened was conclusive scientific proof was
> published that demonstrates,> beyond all doubt, that 9/11 was an inside job.
> That sounds strange to say,> conclusive proof and yet no one noticed. Well,
> in politics is that so odd?>
> >
> >
> >
> > A retired physicist and a number of
> other> scientists co-authored a scientific paper, which
> was published last week,> in which they document the presence of a very
> high-tech explosive called>
> “nanothermiteâ€&Aci
> rc;� in dust samples from areas> around the World Trade Center. The existence of
> this explosive in the dust> was established by sophisticated laboratory
> techniques. Extrapolating from> their samples it appears there were tons of
> explosives in the World Trade> Center and the residue of that is in the dust
> – it is> the smoking gun.
> >
> >
> >
> > There can be no rational doubt
> > that 9/11 was an inside job because those
> chemicals do not exist in nature> or in any materials existing in the World Trade
> Center. They had to be> explosives put in place for that purpose. That
> is the only logical> conclusion.
> >
> >
> >
> > We know for sure that 9/11 was an
> > inside job. Now why do I have to tell you (the
> reader) about this? Why are> you not reading this in the New York Times? Why,
> better yet, are you not> hearing this on Democracy Now? It is hard to
> say, but clearly this is> difficult for people. It is hard to admit that
> our government would> slaughter thousands of innocent people and blame
> others to rally support> for systematic violence in other parts of the
> world.>
> >
> >
> > It is hard to admit that our government would
> murder us, lie to us, and> use those lies to justify the slaughter a
> million Iraqis and stealing> their oil. But that is what happened. We know it
> was an inside job, now we> just have to get enough people to notice since
> the most of the media (the> story below is a very curious exception) simply
> ignore science --> especially when it matters.
> >
> >
> >
> > I am posting this
> > message on a couple of lists where this topic
> has been controversial, in> the past. I trust that finding the smoking gun
> will satisfy the doubters> now. We have to stop these people, which seems
> to mean at present forcing> the Obama Administration to investigate Bush era
> crimes (even though such> an investigation will find the Democrats
> complicit). The nation deserves> the truth and the world deserves the peace that
> can follow admitting the> truth.
> >
> >
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://www.deseretnews.com/home/> Deseret
> News>
> >
> > Traces of Explosives in 9/11 Dust, Scientists
> Say>
> >
> > By
> > <http://www.deseretnews.com/site/staff/1,5231,82,00.html> Elaine> Jarvik
> >
> > Deseret News
> >
> > April 6, 2009
> >
> >
> >
> > Tiny red and gray chips found in the dust from
> the collapse of the> World Trade Center contain highly explosive
> materials —> proof, according to a former BYU professor, that
> 9/11 is still a sinister> mystery.
> >
> >
> >
> > Physicist Steven E. Jones, who
> retired> from Brigham Young University in 2006 after the
> school recoiled from the> controversy surrounding his 9/11 theories, is
> one of nine authors on a> paper published last week in the online,
> peer-reviewed Open Chemical> Physics Journal. Also listed as authors are BYU
> physics professor Jeffrey> Farrer and a professor of nanochemistry at the
> University of Copenhagen in> Denmark.
> >
> >
> >
> > For several years, Jones has
> theorized> that prepositioned explosives, not fires from
> jet fuel, caused the rapid,> symmetrical collapse of the two World Trade
> Center buildings, plus the> collapse of a third building, WTC-7.
> >
> >
> >
> > The newest
> > research, according to the journal authors,
> shows that dust from the> collapsing towers contained a
> "nanothermite" material that is> highly explosive. Although the article draws no
> conclusions about the> source and purpose of the explosives, Jones has
> previously supported a> theory that the collapse of the WTC towers was
> part of a government> conspiracy to ignore warnings about the 9/11
> terrorists so that the attack> would propel America to wage war against
> Afghanistan and Iraq. The next> step, Jones said in a phone interview on Monday,
> is for someone to> investigate "who made the stuff and why it
> was there.">
> >
> >
> > A layer of dust lay over parts of Manhattan
> immediately> following the collapse of the towers, and it was
> samples of this dust that> Jones and fellow researchers requested in a 2006
> paper, hoping to> determine "the whole truth of the events of
> that day." They> eventually tested four samples they received
> from New Yorkers.>
> >
> >
> > One sample was from a man who had swept up a
> handful of dust> on the Brooklyn Bridge, where he was walking
> when the second tower fell.> As the journal authors note, "It was,
> therefore, definitely not> contaminated by the steel-cutting or clean-up
> operations at Ground Zero,> which began later. Furthermore, it is not mixed
> with dust from WTC-7,> which fell hours later." Another man
> collected dust in his apartment,> about five blocks from the World Trade Center,
> on the morning of Sept. 12.> There was a layer about an inch thick on a stack
> of folded laundry near an> open window.
> >
> >
> >
> > Red/gray chips, averaging in size
> > between .2 and 3 mm, were found in all four dust
> samples. The chips were> then analyzed using scanning electron microscopy
> and other high-tech> tools. The red layer of the chips, according to
> the researchers, contains> a "highly energetic" form of thermite.
> While normal thermite (a> mixture of finely granulated aluminum and an
> oxide of metal) can be> incendiary, "super thermite" is
> explosive. He says there is no> benign explanation for the thermite in the WTC
> dust.>
> >
> >
> > Jones made headlines in 2005 when he argued that
> the rapid and> symmetrical fall of the World Trade Center
> looked like the result of> pre-positioned explosives. He argued that fires
> alone wouldn't have been> hot enough to crumble the buildings; and that
> even if struck by planes,> the towers should have been strong enough to
> support the weight of the> tops as they crumbled
> — unless they were leveled by> explosives.
> >
> >
> >
> > Essentially forced to retire, Jones
> > says he is now paying for research out of his
> own pocket. He likens> himself to Galileo and Newton, who stood by
> their consciences. "I> would like to think I could stand up for the
> truth," he says. The> dust study vindicates his earlier theories,
> Jones says, but he has mixed> feelings about the implications. "As a
> young student said to me a> while back: 'It's exciting from a scientific
> point of view, because things> are now making sense. But I feel sad for
> my>
> country.' ">
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________> ope mailing list
> > ope@li
> sts.csuchico.edu> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ope mailing list
> ope@li
> sts.csuchico.eduhttps://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Sun Apr 19 09:06:48 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 12 2009 - 15:26:04 EDT