RE: [OPE] The Science of 9/11

From: Allin Cottrell <cottrell@wfu.edu>
Date: Wed Apr 22 2009 - 00:00:18 EDT

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Paul Zarembka wrote:

> This is supposed to be a scientific listserv. Allin made a
> point-blank statement and I called on him for evidence.

My statement was a statement of opinion as to which arguments
seemed more cogent and convincing to me.

> I have no problem with disagreements; I have problems with
> blanket assertions on important topics. Thus I asked for
> evidence. Why did I mention evidence for the identities of the
> alleged hijackers? Because the 9/11 Commission Report did not
> provide evidence and I was baiting Allin to overcome the lack of
> evidence therein. So far, he hasn't and he is not alone; few
> supporters of the Bush administration story of 9/11 that bin
> Laden was behind 9/11 want to actually say WHY they accept that
> story.

How about, for instance, the Al-Jazeera transcript of bin Ladin's
speech of 2004 in which he took responsibility for the attacks?
That's an NSA fake-up too?

Allin Cottrell
_______________________________________________
ope mailing list
ope@lists.csuchico.edu
https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/ope
Received on Wed Apr 22 00:02:17 2009

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 12 2009 - 15:26:04 EDT