[OPE-L:3322] Re: Re: Measurement of value

• Next message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Previous message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3321] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value"
• In reply to: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3316] Re: Measurement of value"
• Next in thread: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Reply: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ show plain text ]

I would not say to abandon empirical research, but to think more in terms of
back-of-the-envelope calculations rather than to aspire to sophisticated
techniques.

"Patrick L. Mason" wrote:

> Alfredo (and others who agree with his position) has proven a bit too much.
> All empirical work is "messy." Are we then to abandon empirical research?
>

--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael@ecst.csuchico.edu

• Next message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Previous message: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3321] Re: Re: Fwd: Re: RE: Re: objectivity of value"
• In reply to: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3316] Re: Measurement of value"
• Next in thread: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Reply: Patrick L. Mason: "[OPE-L:3323] Re: Re: Re: Measurement of value"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 00:00:11 EDT