Andrew K wrote in [OPE-L:4854]: > Jerry wrote: "Just as clearly, Marx's theory of value > can't reasonably be described as being > a "new value theory"." > Not clear to me. In fact, that's what I meant by the > new value theory. OK, at least that mystery is solved. Of course, "new" and "old" are relative and imprecise terms. Yet, I think that most would agree that Marx's 19th Century value theory is no longer "new". (Indeed, original editions of his writings are sometimes sold in antique shops and antiquarian bookstores). > <snip, JL> It was a new rediscovery. I think that "rediscovery" is an expression that is more in keeping with what has been said elsewhere about the TSSI by its advocates. In solidarity, Jerry
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 01 2001 - 14:01:38 EST