In reply to Ajit [5680]. Why your demand to set out in the discussion on this list elementary VFT? Of course we can have brief reminders, but these can be no substitute for polished published work. Perhaps we have different opinions about OPEL? Geert At 5/29/01Tuesday, you wrote: >nicola taylor wrote: > > > > > > > ... i.e. the problem for theory is > > to establish how the social form of production for exchange *determines* > > the necessary (internal) interconnection of labour and value and of labour > > time and price. > >_____________________ > >So how does it do it? As long as you don't tell us exatly how "the social form >of production for exchange [in capitalism--added] *determines* the necessary >(internal) interconnection of labour and value and of labour time and price." >How are we to understand what you are saying has any meaning or not. >Furthermore, we also need to know whether "labour" and "labour time" have the >same meaning above or different; and if different, what is the difference >between the two. Moreover, how do you define "value" and "prices" above? >Cheers, ajit sinha > > > > > > > As I see it, our differences on all other questions stem from these > > differences of interpretation and method. > > > > comradely > > Nicky > > > > ---------------------------------- > > Nicola Mostyn (Taylor) > > Faculty of Economics > > Murdoch University > > Australia > > Telephone: 61-8-9385 1130
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:08 EDT