re Nicky's 5679 >The existence of the market (a more concrete >determination of the value-form as mode of association) does *not* >therefore transcend the contradiction posed by dissociation, but shows >value that it cannot exist for itself (independently of price). Yes, Marx's value theory aims from the very first part of Capital 1 to illuminate the contradictions of capitalist production. For Marx the law of value is not a law of equilibrium, as even Rubin maintained (Fred doubtless knows that Mattick Sr took issue with Rubin on this). Ajit has argued that in the first part Marx works from a Walrasian problematic; Fred now suggests that Marx had interest in equilibrium values. But as we learn in part I, the possibility of crisis inheres in the separation or contradiction between individual and general abstract social labor--it is this polarization that Marx attempts to lay bare; moreover, the money commodity (or its symbolic substitutes) having become (as Chris A recently underlined) value or general abstract social labor itself--rather than simply a means of circulation or a numeraire--can under determinate conditions be valued in itself, thereby causing the networks of generalized commodity trade to collapse. Yours, Rakesh
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Jun 02 2001 - 00:00:08 EDT