[OPE-L:6597] RE: [Andrew Kliman] Open Letter to OPE-L

From: Michael Williams (michaelj.williams@tiscali.co.uk)
Date: Fri Feb 15 2002 - 15:55:55 EST


Ale,

Clearly I neither have nor want a veto over what is discussed on the list.

Nor is it simply a lack of interest that prompted my request.

But you are right - I can use my delete button.

No more from me on this topic.

michael

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu
[mailto:owner-ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu]On Behalf Of Alejandro Ramos
Sent: 15 February 2002 19:03
To: ope-l@galaxy.csuchico.edu
Cc: multiple recipients of list
Subject: [OPE-L:6593] [Andrew Kliman] Open Letter to OPE-L



Mike:

I'd really appreciate if this issue can be discussed here. I'm not familiar
with all the *information* concerning this argument and I think that it's
not a "personal" matter. It, rather, involves some practices that can
affect people different from Andrew. Moreover, Andrew's case is interesting
in itself. I don't see why this cannot be discussed here. I do understand
you are not interested, but we all have the old resource to avoid the
threads we're not interested in: the "delete" key.

Comradly,

Alejandro

At 18:13 15/02/02 -0000, you wrote:
>Can I request that OPE-L cease to act as middleman in this on-going
>discussion? We are all, I think, familiar with the issues on each/every
side
>of the argument.
>
>michael

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.320 / Virus Database: 179 - Release Date: 30/01/2002

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.320 / Virus Database: 179 - Release Date: 30/01/2002



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Sat Mar 02 2002 - 00:00:05 EST