From: Paul Zarembka (zarembka@BUFFALO.EDU)
Date: Tue May 25 2004 - 08:21:15 EDT
Howard, In your interpretation 'value' is independent of the buying and selling of labor power, independent of the capitalist mode of production, and exists in C-M-C, simple commodity exchange? Paul ************************************************************************* Vol.21-Neoliberalism in Crisis, Accumulation, and Rosa Luxemburg's Legacy RESEARCH IN POLITICAL ECONOMY, Zarembka/Soederberg, eds, Elsevier Science ********************** http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/PZarembka On Mon, 24 May 2004, Howard Engelskirchen wrote: > .... But for Marx, > value is not something a commodity has; value constitutes a commodity. > If a product of labor doesn't have value, then it is not a commodity. > Value constitutes what a commodity is.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 26 2004 - 00:00:02 EDT